Aug 4, 2006 #1 X xdkimx Limp Gawd Joined Jul 17, 2005 Messages 443 A)cpu: 2607mhz / 237htt 9:10 divider ram: 2.5-3-2-5 / 216fsb or B)cpu: 2607 / 237htt 1:1 divider ram: 3-4-3-8 / 237fsb benchmarks came out identical so i dont know D:
A)cpu: 2607mhz / 237htt 9:10 divider ram: 2.5-3-2-5 / 216fsb or B)cpu: 2607 / 237htt 1:1 divider ram: 3-4-3-8 / 237fsb benchmarks came out identical so i dont know D:
Aug 4, 2006 #2 B boscogne Limp Gawd Joined May 26, 2006 Messages 229 i'd probably go the the first choice. running divider with tighter timings is better than 1:1 with looser timings IMO.
i'd probably go the the first choice. running divider with tighter timings is better than 1:1 with looser timings IMO.
Aug 4, 2006 #3 R rysher Gawd Joined Oct 13, 2005 Messages 895 cpu: 2607mhz / 237htt 9:10 divider ram: 2.5-3-2-5 / 216fsb 1t or 2t?
Aug 4, 2006 #4 X xdkimx Limp Gawd Joined Jul 17, 2005 Messages 443 both are set at 1t i think ill stay with the first choice as well it turns out the first one comes out with slightly higher benchmarks in cs:source first one being an average of 73fps and the second one being around 70fps
both are set at 1t i think ill stay with the first choice as well it turns out the first one comes out with slightly higher benchmarks in cs:source first one being an average of 73fps and the second one being around 70fps
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}