This thread is about the comparing 20" (A)S-IPS panels. In particular, I will post my findings about the 4:3 LM201U04 and LM201U05 panels, and compare to the 16:9 LM201WE2 panel.
For reference, the following monitors use these panels (according to TFT central):
LM201U04: Dell 2001FP, NEC LCD2070NX, BenQ FP2091
LM201U05: HP LP2065, LG L2000C, NEC LCD2090UXi, BenQ FP2092
LM201WE2: NEC LCD20WGX2
xbit labs has posted a large 20" tft roundup where it is possible to compare these panels.
It is interesting to compare the two BenQs FP2091 (using the older panel - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_11.html) and the FP2092 (using the newer panel - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_13.html).
The result is that these two panels don't differ very much. Both have relatively average contrast, and quite slow response rate (peak around 30ms, but doesn't fall much below this) as they don't use any form of RTC.
This is in sharp contrast to the NEC LCD20WGX2, which uses an AS-IPS panel with RTC, and as a result peaks at just 10ms (albeit introducing some RTC errors).
For comparison's sake, an accelerated MVA matrix (eg. the Acer AL2032WA, http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_5.html) normally keeps under 10ms, though it shoots up to 60ms for very dark tones.
So I guess we don't have an equivalent 4:3 screen to compete with NEC's 16:9 offering yet. I would have liked a detailed test of the HP LP2065 which I'm considering buying, but results should be similar to the BenQ, which uses the same panel.
Comments and flames welcome
For reference, the following monitors use these panels (according to TFT central):
LM201U04: Dell 2001FP, NEC LCD2070NX, BenQ FP2091
LM201U05: HP LP2065, LG L2000C, NEC LCD2090UXi, BenQ FP2092
LM201WE2: NEC LCD20WGX2
xbit labs has posted a large 20" tft roundup where it is possible to compare these panels.
It is interesting to compare the two BenQs FP2091 (using the older panel - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_11.html) and the FP2092 (using the newer panel - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_13.html).
The result is that these two panels don't differ very much. Both have relatively average contrast, and quite slow response rate (peak around 30ms, but doesn't fall much below this) as they don't use any form of RTC.
This is in sharp contrast to the NEC LCD20WGX2, which uses an AS-IPS panel with RTC, and as a result peaks at just 10ms (albeit introducing some RTC errors).
For comparison's sake, an accelerated MVA matrix (eg. the Acer AL2032WA, http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/other/display/20-21inch-2_5.html) normally keeps under 10ms, though it shoots up to 60ms for very dark tones.
So I guess we don't have an equivalent 4:3 screen to compete with NEC's 16:9 offering yet. I would have liked a detailed test of the HP LP2065 which I'm considering buying, but results should be similar to the BenQ, which uses the same panel.
Comments and flames welcome