Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i have done that by throwing them agisnt a wall they shatter like glass if hit right...Zlash said:Uh thats a lot of force to be shattering a cd like that. I don't know if i could do that within 10 wacks with a hammer.
I do believe them. It can happen for the reasons stated above. It's similar to how your car windows can shatter from too much heat build up in your car.According to the user they went to lunch and came back and tried to eject thier cd...
Zlash said:Uh thats a lot of force to be shattering a cd like that. I don't know if i could do that within 10 wacks with a hammer.
Lunas said:i think the most times it occurs is in a 52x drive since they are more wide spread than a 72x drive.
GJSNeptune said:
Sorry I can't afford an LCD larger than 15 inches. And pictures too wide for 1024x768 should be shrunk. Irfanview is free to download and simple to use to boot.Laforge said:Bigger screen : Faster Computer : Faster Internet Connection : Be [H]ard!
hey! i read this thread by chance, anyway i've done what others users have done stomp on it. and i have heard that 52x and higher drives will destroy a cd on very very rare occasions as every one else has pointed out.MaMMa said:qwertyman did it
Qwertyman said:hey! i read this thread by chance, anyway i've done what others users have done stomp on it. and i have heard that 52x and higher drives will destroy a cd on very very rare occasions as every one else has pointed out.
GJSNeptune said:Sorry I can't afford an LCD larger than 15 inches. And pictures too wide for 1024x768 should be shrunk. Irfanview is free to download and simple to use to boot.
kenwood has ceased production of the tru 72 and tru 52 due to increased cost and high failure rate of the drives...Laforge said:THe zen "TruX 52X and 72X" drives don't actually spin at 52x or 72x.. that's why they are quite.. they spin at a much slower rate..
The 52x spins at the speed of a 8-10X drive and has *7* pickup lasers.
The 72x spins at the speed of a 12X drive, and has *8* pickup lasers.
Consequently, they have ~70x and ~96x of data collection. However, due to the overhead of their technology, they lose something in the translation : resulting in the 52x and 72x reported speeds.
I've owned both of these drives.
On my 52X, Ms-Office would install in 71 seconds. [that was office 2000, not XP, or 2003]
On my 72X, I could install half-life in 45 seconds.
However.. they both had one serious issue [two, actually]
DAE was limited to "single laser" performance -- so.. that magic 52x or 72x was more like 9x to 12x...
Additional problem was if a disk had any IMPERFECTION, the drive would get confused, and lock my system up HARD.
Hence,. I have switched to 16X DVD Drives which run stable and quite, and give me real world performance of about ~15 megabytes a second. or.. ~100X CD-Rom speed. I do not use cd-rom disks much anymore : Maybe ONCE because I image all my disks [including audio cd's] and put my originals away in a safe place.