ImperfectLink
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
- Messages
- 327
Today I decided to give GPU video encoding a whirl and here are my results:
Matrix 1 VIDEO_TS > iPhone H264 480x320 @ 960kbits/sec
1st run was in Handbrake:
~18mins
2nd run was in Badaboom beta 0.9:
~13.5mins
Quality is subjectively the same and filesize is similar (Badaboom didnt crop the video or it would be the same). Audio was in sync in both files and black level looked the same on this screen. Badaboom did leave a ETI watermark on there too but I don't think that would hurt performance.
Hardware used:
Intel Q9550 @ 3.8GHZ
Asus Rampage Formula
8GB ram @ 1081
BFG GTX280 OC2 (650mhz)
Both times are nothing to sneeze at but the GPU isnt reaching the advertised performance. I can't say that I'm disappointed, but I don't know whether the difference is enough to warrant the amount of money they want for Badaboom. What do you guys think and what are your experiences?
Xen.
PS. I have 25 more runs of Badaboom til the beta expires. Let me know if there are any quick tests you might like to see.
Matrix 1 VIDEO_TS > iPhone H264 480x320 @ 960kbits/sec
1st run was in Handbrake:
~18mins
2nd run was in Badaboom beta 0.9:
~13.5mins
Quality is subjectively the same and filesize is similar (Badaboom didnt crop the video or it would be the same). Audio was in sync in both files and black level looked the same on this screen. Badaboom did leave a ETI watermark on there too but I don't think that would hurt performance.
Hardware used:
Intel Q9550 @ 3.8GHZ
Asus Rampage Formula
8GB ram @ 1081
BFG GTX280 OC2 (650mhz)
Both times are nothing to sneeze at but the GPU isnt reaching the advertised performance. I can't say that I'm disappointed, but I don't know whether the difference is enough to warrant the amount of money they want for Badaboom. What do you guys think and what are your experiences?
Xen.
PS. I have 25 more runs of Badaboom til the beta expires. Let me know if there are any quick tests you might like to see.