Lets Frybench!

rvborgh said:
i have the same problem... it only uses 32 out of 48 cores :(
Click to expand...

Ok, so I guess Frybench maxes out at 32 logical cores which is only one of my 2 CPUs.

Oh Well

Here is my result nonetheless.

Fry1_zpsjwrafulb.jpg

CPUZ_zps1ew0nnh4.jpg
 
It is great to see such a fantastic result for a single cpu (or even less than a single cpu actually). What a power house! How much wattage does that beast pull during the test?
 
rvborgh said:
It is great to see such a fantastic result for a single cpu (or even less than a single cpu actually). What a power house! How much wattage does that beast pull during the test?
Click to expand...

With a GTX 680 and a Samsung 850 EVO 250GB:

- Idle: 78 W
- Frybench (36 Threads): 280W
- Cinebench R15 (72 Threads): 440W
 
rvborgh said:
It is great to see such a fantastic result for a single cpu (or even less than a single cpu actually). What a power house! How much wattage does that beast pull during the test?
Click to expand...

But.. But.. it runs so absolutely slow on a single CPU! And I even had it overclocked 33% >: (

TCYydo1.png


/sarcasm
 
Slow, slow, slow, slow results. But not like the single CPU above me! :eek:

No tweaks, no OC, when built this budget rig yesterday (replaced FX8120 and glitchy board) I didnt bother reinstalling windows, just booted off the HD and went with it.
fryrender.jpg
 
Results from my new setup on it's daily driver settings. I may try a more suicidal approach later.

fry4500b.jpg

[size=-2]Edit...dropped a couple of seconds with a memory tweak.[/size]
 
Last edited:
SpeedyVV said:
Ok, so I guess Frybench maxes out at 32 logical cores which is only one of my 2 CPUs.

Oh Well

Here is my result nonetheless.
Click to expand...

Disable hyperthreading and see if your time gets faster. Just wondering if thread priority is choosing to use all physical cores since you have more than it needs or it's still trying to use logical cores as well.
 
YBS1 said:
Disable hyperthreading and see if your time gets faster. Just wondering if thread priority is choosing to use all physical cores since you have more than it needs or it's still trying to use logical cores as well.
Click to expand...

Good idea! But I am having a brain fart... how do I disable hyper threading again?
 
Whee! I want to play!

oFMN7bp.jpg


Err... There must be a setting or something that isn't toggled, right guys? Right??

sigh. Skylake *cannot* get here soon enough.
 
How about revive this little thread for a turbo modded /hacked xeon e5 2686 v3 (18c/36t) result?
05212017-214716.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: lazz
like this
I know this is the Intel subforum but I found this software in my benchmarking folder and decided to give it a run.... er557 had a total render time of 1min 22 sec with an 18C/36t part...I ran it on my 3700x system in sig, and this is awesome:


FryBench 3700X.png


Where are you 9900K boyz at?!?!:cautious::cautious::cautious:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top