PETA's entire purpose in doing this is to try to get some footage of some 1%er slob who's violating game laws, then use that to paint all hunters as drunken redneck psycho's who just like killing shit while drunk.
It's an old tactic: find a gun owner who commits a violent crime, therefore all gun owners are crazy; find some black kid that mugs an old lady, and all blacks kids are thugs.
PETA says on their website:
but
So it's bad when animals suffer from humans, but when nature does it it's just dandy. How can you argue with that?
It's an old tactic: find a gun owner who commits a violent crime, therefore all gun owners are crazy; find some black kid that mugs an old lady, and all blacks kids are thugs.
PETA says on their website:
Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters.
but
"Even when unusual natural occurrences cause overpopulation, natural processes work to stabilize the group. Starvation and disease can be tragic, but they are natures ways of ensuring that healthy, strong animals survive and maintain the strength of the rest of their herd or group."
So it's bad when animals suffer from humans, but when nature does it it's just dandy. How can you argue with that?