Picked up G80's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you, decapitator, tell what scores you got on PS2.0, PS3.0/HDR tests, please?
 
Results of the gpuinstr test:

MAD/RSQ/MAD/RCP 4 512 256 100 124.5119 ms 53.8975 GInstr/sec
 
great work folks! just hope that we have some on sale in the UK soon! i think im gonna wait a week or three, and then go for it (hopefully price might drop some £50!)

i get the feeling that this is going to do the business!


oh, one question to the folks who have these boards - what sort of PSUs are you running, and are they feeling the pressure?! (i know mike has pcp&c 750) - its just i just purchased a corsair hx620 in anticipation, hope it was the right decision!
 
5aboy said:
great work folks! just hope that we have some on sale in the UK soon! i think im gonna wait a week or three, and then go for it (hopefully price might drop some £50!)

i get the feeling that this is going to do the business!


oh, one question to the folks who have these boards - what sort of PSUs are you running, and are they feeling the pressure?! (i know mike has pcp&c 750) - its just i just purchased a corsair hx620 in anticipation, hope it was the right decision!
Click to expand...

The GTX box says it needs a 450 watt PSU with 30 amps or more on the 12v rail.
 
I tried enabling several different versions of AA through the Nvidia control panel, but none of them will work in conjunction with Oblivion's HDR.

This is what it looked like when any form of AA (4x, 8x, even 16x) was enabled in the control panel:

aahp4.jpg


As you can see, no luck.
 
Here are some shots with 16xAF applied in the Nvidia control panel. Resolution is 1600x1200.

1qp5.jpg



2si8.jpg



3sn4.jpg



4rt8.jpg
 
Call of Duty 2 with 16xS AA applied at 1024x768 resolution:

11eo3.jpg




22pl7.jpg




Anyone notice something wrong in this picture? :p Damn drivers.


33bk0.jpg
 
Why are u playing at 1024? the FPS seem high enough to raise the resolution?
 
Suflex said:
Why are u playing at 1024? the FPS seem high enough to raise the resolution?
Click to expand...

Because 16xS AA would be hard to notice at 1600x1200 resolution. On 1600x1200, the FPS never dips below 35 on COD2 with all settings maxed out (with regular in game 4xAA).
 
Yeah you're right.

you said you were getting 60 FPS outdoors in Oblivion, is that with 16AF?
 
Gpuinstr results: (After running several times to get the best possible score)

Mad_vec_scalar.bat:

MAD/RSQ/MAD/RCP 4 512 256 100 117.5909 ms 57.0698 GInstr/sec


Arb.bat:

ABS 4 512 64 100 49.4013 ms 33.9611 GInstr/sec
ADD 4 512 64 100 49.6655 ms 33.7804 GInstr/sec
COS 4 512 64 100 66.8663 ms 25.0907 GInstr/sec
DP3 4 512 64 100 42.4601 ms 39.5129 GInstr/sec
DP4 4 512 64 100 58.7547 ms 28.5547 GInstr/sec
DPH 4 512 64 100 55.9993 ms 29.9597 GInstr/sec
DST 4 512 64 100 12.4963 ms 134.2577 GInstr/sec
EX2 4 512 64 100 67.1127 ms 24.9986 GInstr/sec
FLR 4 512 64 100 49.2314 ms 34.0783 GInstr/sec
FRC 4 512 64 100 104.8357 ms 16.0033 GInstr/sec
LG2 4 512 64 100 44.4788 ms 37.7195 GInstr/sec
LIT 4 512 64 100 7.7591 ms 216.2267 GInstr/sec
LRP 4 512 64 100 120.9673 ms 13.8692 GInstr/sec
MAD 4 512 64 100 61.2019 ms 27.4129 GInstr/sec
MAX 4 512 64 100 50.3553 ms 33.3177 GInstr/sec
MIN 4 512 64 100 50.0916 ms 33.4931 GInstr/sec
MOV 4 512 64 100 7.7563 ms 216.3046 GInstr/sec
MUL 4 512 64 100 63.8162 ms 26.2899 GInstr/sec
POW 4 512 64 100 138.4170 ms 12.1208 GInstr/sec
RCP 4 512 64 100 7.7647 ms 216.0711 GInstr/sec
RSQ 4 512 64 100 44.4864 ms 37.7132 GInstr/sec
SCS 4 512 64 100 69.0663 ms 24.2915 GInstr/sec
SIN 4 512 64 100 67.0622 ms 25.0174 GInstr/sec
SUB 4 512 64 100 50.0809 ms 33.5002 GInstr/sec
XPD 4 512 64 100 80.6765 ms 20.7957 GInstr/sec


Nvfp2.bat:

ABS 4 512 64 100 88.5386 ms 18.9490 GInstr/sec
ADD 4 512 64 100 46.7453 ms 35.8907 GInstr/sec
COS 4 512 64 100 83.1284 ms 20.1823 GInstr/sec
DP3 4 512 64 100 83.4215 ms 20.1114 GInstr/sec
DP4 4 512 64 100 104.4007 ms 16.0700 GInstr/sec
DPH 4 512 64 100 102.7410 ms 16.3296 GInstr/sec
DST 4 512 64 100 22.2922 ms 75.2604 GInstr/sec
EX2 4 512 64 100 82.9036 ms 20.2370 GInstr/sec
FLR 4 512 64 100 87.1591 ms 19.2490 GInstr/sec
FRC 4 512 64 100 93.7396 ms 17.8977 GInstr/sec
LG2 4 512 64 100 74.2823 ms 22.5857 GInstr/sec
LIT 4 512 64 100 193.8900 ms 8.6530 GInstr/sec
LRP 4 512 64 100 99.8010 ms 16.8107 GInstr/sec
MAD 4 512 64 100 102.0767 ms 16.4359 GInstr/sec
MAX 4 512 64 100 33.5308 ms 50.0352 GInstr/sec
MIN 4 512 64 100 33.5286 ms 50.0386 GInstr/sec
MOV 4 512 64 100 14.7499 ms 113.7445 GInstr/sec
MUL 4 512 64 100 46.7241 ms 35.9070 GInstr/sec
POW 4 512 64 100 139.6300 ms 12.0155 GInstr/sec
RCP 4 512 64 100 73.7800 ms 22.7395 GInstr/sec
RSQ 4 512 64 100 74.5715 ms 22.4982 GInstr/sec
SCS 4 512 64 100 101.6255 ms 16.5089 GInstr/sec
SIN 4 512 64 100 82.8234 ms 20.2566 GInstr/sec
SUB 4 512 64 100 46.7213 ms 35.9091 GInstr/sec
XPD 4 512 64 100 97.9256 ms 17.1326 GInstr/sec
RFL 4 512 64 100 109.9450 ms 15.2596 GInstr/sec
DIV 4 512 64 100 55.9258 ms 29.9991 GInstr/sec
DP2 4 512 64 100 64.8725 ms 25.8618 GInstr/sec
NRM 4 512 64 100 88.1391 ms 19.0349 GInstr/sec
 
Suflex said:
Yeah you're right, I reckon you won't really notice 16xaa untill you're playing at 1920 or higher....

you said you were getting 60 FPS outdoors in Oblivion, is that with 16AF?
Click to expand...

In Oblivion, at 1600x1200 with all sliders and video options maxed, along with 16xAF being forced in the control panel, the average foilage framerate is in the mid 40's.
 
mike686 said:
In Oblivion, at 1600x1200 with all sliders and video options maxed, along with 16xAF being forced in the control panel, the average foilage framerate is in the mid 40's.
Click to expand...

Staying up all night, excited with your 8800.. go and get some sleep LOL LOL!!! :D
 
dR.Jester said:
COD2 looks damn smooth. Oblivion looks like crap. :p
Click to expand...

Oblivion doesn't render far-away land with good quality, so it's blurr. However, the good-quality rendering area can be changed in the ini-file, thus making it even more demanding game for hardware. Basic value is 7x7, and upping it to 9x9 (or higher) does miracles if my memory is to be trusted.
 
Btw, how about Flight Simulator X with Vista and beta DX10? Does Flight Simulator allow ATM dx10, or does it need to be patched by M$ to allow the support?
 
Cuthalu said:
Btw, how about Flight Simulator X with Vista and beta DX10? Does Flight Simulator allow ATM dx10, or does it need to be patched by M$ to allow the support?
Click to expand...

It must be patched.
 
So far, I'm not that impressed. My current system performs similarly...oh wait thats one 8800GTX. *weep*

:p

COME ON LAUNCH DAY!!! :cool:
 
That's_Corporate said:
Meh... not impressed, especially not for $650.
Waiting for R600.
Click to expand...

only those who are biased would not be impressed with this card, perhaps you should be in the ATI forums?
 
I can't decided anything regarding this card since the shipping drivers are obviously FUBAR and won't allow to show what the card can do, IQ wise. Can the two lucky guys comment on any improvements they can see so far?

We can see it has horsepower which is should since this is a whole new architechure. Too bad ATi can't get their timing down so we could see the G80 against the R600. I think it will be the G81 against the R600.

I don't like that * next to HDCP ready on the front of the box considering the rumors that is it broken. My only hope is the * is calling out it requires a HDCP ready display only.
 
R1ckCa1n said:
I can't decided anything regarding this card since the shipping drivers are obviously FUBAR and won't allow to show what the card can do, IQ wise. Can the two lucky guys comment on any improvements they can see so far?

We can see it has horsepower which is should since this is a whole new architechure. Too bad ATi can't get their timing down so we could see the G80 against the R600. I think it will be the G81 against the R600.

I don't like that * next to HDCP ready on the front of the box considering the rumors that is it broken. My only hope is the * is calling out it requires a HDCP ready display only.
Click to expand...
you need to wait for some reviews to see that,have patience.
 
i thought the memory ran at 1.8Ghz DDR which would be 900Mhz SDR, which begs the question, why is the memory clocked to 525Mhz?
 
nobody_here said:
i thought the memory ran at 1.8Ghz DDR which would be 900Mhz SDR, which begs the question, why is the memory clocked to 525Mhz?
Click to expand...
Overclocked to 1050.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top