Looking over the stats from WD the RE still uses 512n which is odd today and the SE uses AF
Technically native 4K [if using windows 8] should make AF drives faster then emulation, right?
This would point to WD wanted the RE to be most compatible with all systems, even older ones.
Seems odd two data center enterprise type drives with different formats.
I looked for benches for AF drives in 7 and 8 to see if there is any noticeable difference but could not find one.
Technically native 4K [if using windows 8] should make AF drives faster then emulation, right?
This would point to WD wanted the RE to be most compatible with all systems, even older ones.
Seems odd two data center enterprise type drives with different formats.
I looked for benches for AF drives in 7 and 8 to see if there is any noticeable difference but could not find one.