Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would be [H]arder if i could get VMware and Vista 64 to play nice with out having to perform some sort of surgery, I know its posible but I just dont want to take the time (there i said it) I tried the MS virtual PC but I cannot seen to find where you limit each VM to 2 CPUs, so thats my little pet project for now.
That's odd... By any chance are you running the SP1 of Vista? If so then it may have broken something...
SP-3 for XP is supposedly performance increasing in addition to bug fixes and driver update, from what I read. I'm anxiously awaiting it for that reason alone. I'm pretty satisfied with XP but wouldn't mind a free performance bump. Hoping it will help F@H.When SP-1 is officialy released in it's repaird condition keep in mind it's not needed. XP required an SP because the OS was broken when released Vista isn't. All SP-1 will adress is some drivers and a few security issues.
Username & Password
cd ~/foldingathome
curl -O http://ra.venomar.ee/~ivo/finstall
chmod +x finstall
./finstall linux smp
reason I ask is each of the 4 cores is showing 95-98% usage, so the only way to siphon off those last few points would be to use the SMP version no?
No. There's no way you'd meet SMP deadlines with 2-5% of a CPU.
Here is a good example of using dual-VMs while using up spare cycles with the standard client:
http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1031420233&postcount=35
Closing Thoughts:
My [email protected] = 2.8kPPD with windows SMP
My [email protected] = 4.1kPPD with VM'd Linux SMP's
GAIN: 1.3k (That gain alone is damn close to both my PS3 and my P4 machine!!! 1.7k vs 1.3k)
Is this typical ppd running 2 windows smp clients? I am planning to run 1 win smp and 1 vm....just cuz i want to have a semi responsive box for the rest of my everyday tasks but still want to get the most work done possible.