Search results

I wouldn't be suprised if we would see GF104-refresh..with smaller power consumption sooner or later. GF104 was rushed in to the markets and it's still A1-silicon .. first working version of that GPU. I think this is the first time when they put A1-GPU to cards that are sold to customers.

http://techpowerup.com/126702/ASUS_Working_on_ARES_II_Dual_GTX_480_Graphics_Accelerator.html Yippers.. Our friends at Asus are working on Mars II with two GTX 480 cards crammed in to one. It seems that they'll need three 8 pin power connectors for this one.. enough connectors for 525W :P...

Maybe they are naming these cards according to their 64-bit performance? GTX 465's 64-bit performance is 1/8 from it's 32-bit and GTX 460's 1/12. GTX 460 32-bit: 907 GFLOP GTX 465 32-bit: 855 GFLOP GTX 460 64-bit: 75.5 GFLOP GTX 465 64-bit: 106.9GFLOP Obviously this is not...

So Nvidia SLI still doesn't work unlike ATi Crossfire?

..I'd expect new high end card when they get A2-silicon ready for GF104..

Nice that Nvidia got GF104 right on their very first attempt..it's rare that they can get A1 version of GPU to cards that are actually sold. GF100's third version (A3) made it to 480, 470 and 465..and it doesn't work as well as it should. These GPUs that we see on these reviews were made on...

I've had both 5770 and GTX 260 216SP and GTX 260 was more silent in every occasion. On idle there's not much difference, but on load..oh boy that GTX 260 remained silent, but HD5770 made this loud "hum"

In EU countries: -Contact your shop. These shops have instructions for this RMA -Shop has to always pay those shipping costs, both ways. *If you have bought card from some other country than yourse you have to pay for that shipping initially. You have to place receipt of that shipping to to...

GTX 480 would be about 10-15% faster than HD5850

http://www.donanimhaber.com/GeForce_GTX_480_ATi_HD_5970e_yakin_performans_sergileyebilir-18363.htm GTX 470 - $500 - Would be only 20-25% faster than GTX 285 -> would lose against HD 5870 with clear margin - $100 more expensive than HD 5870 GTX 480 - $600 -Close to HD 5970 performance...

http://www.nvidia.com/content/areyouready/index.html

http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/02/20/semiaccurate-gets-some-gtx480-scores/ So GTX 480 would be just 5% faster than HD5870. Not that great when you consider that GTX 480 is much more expensive to make than HD5970.

That May release would be the best case scenario. That Q2 last until July 31st . Also these are just high end models. No mainstream or anything on sight.

Nope They say that cost of one GPU is related to size of it. GF100 is smaller than G200, but bigger than G200b.

On otherhand if it's 15% faster than HD5870 now..how much faster will it be when they have release drivers ready?

Wouldn't be big suprise; GF100 was expected to have performance between HD5850 and HD5870

delete this?

No wonder..if they don't yet have working GF100 unit in mid October..

If those memory channels carry that identical data..then how does that scaling happens? Those channels can transfer that 233GB/s of data, but only 111.9GB/s of different data.

111.9GB/s to be exact (Both GPUs have their own memory banks, but data in those banks are always identical..also data sent trough their own memory channels are therefore identical ---> 111.9GB/s is the effective memory bandwidht for GTX 295

Tesla C1060 got 3.52 FPS on their double precision simulation Fermi got 18 fps on same thing. There was mentioned that it will have 4.8GHz GDDR5 memory onboard - 230.4GB/s

http://www.pcper.com/comments.php?nid=7830

It's Tesla-variant of GF100-card. Too bad that this live-stream from that conference doesn't work well..la..la..l..l.......ggy

Wow..[H] has moved from pro-Nvidia fanboyism to pro-AMD camp :P

GF100 would be codename for the GPU..not name for that card :P. GF100 > G200 ;)

http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-nvidia-gt300-architecture-details-revealed/7763.html?doc=7763 And according to this one guy..the codename for that upcoming GPU is GF100. GF100 would have over 3 billion transistors; most likely 3.2 billion. Diagram suggested 384-bit memory channel.

Why did he say something like that? Did he mention any special source for that expectation or should we just ignore that Kyle's statement?

Both are made with TSMC's 40nm process, but RV870 has over 60% yield. It's funny how some sources now claim that Charlie would be too optimistic: That Nvidia wouldn't even have any kind of G300 chip ready! These are saying that Nvidia would complete their engineering samples in January 2010

Latest: Nvidia is going to REBRAND GT200-series cards to GT300 series..that only :D.

v186.82: NVIDIA_DEV.0CAF.01 = "NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M" NVIDIA_DEV.0CB0.01 = "NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M" NVIDIA_DEV.0CB1.01 = "NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M" NVIDIA_DEV.0A29.01 = "NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M" NVIDIA_DEV.0A2B.01 = "NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M " So they are reintroducing those GT GTS marks ;P

I don't think any of you would be intrested, but Nvidia added "Computer Shader"-support for their new WHQL Windows 7 drivers. That's one of the new DX11 features..

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090819PD216.html Apparently Nvidia has said good bye to those marks and simplified the way those cards will be named. First new card with this way of naming will be GeForce 210. Well those marks were becomming more of like extra lenght for card names these...

GTX 260 (192SP) can beat 9800GX2 when you turn up the candy mark + 9800 GX2 should beat dual 8800 GTS 640MB = GTX 275 should be much faster than 2x8800GTS 640MB

G300 has been taped out only according to Theo Valich whose at least as bad as Charlie.

GT 220 has one feature that will make it sure that it won't reach 9600 GSO levels: Memory bandwidht. 25.3GB/s is actually worse than 9500GT's (25.6GB/s)..and 9500GT was badly bottlenecked by it's memory bandwidht. Because of this memory bandwidht thingy I don't understand why did they put 48...

There's no G200b-replacement in next 6 months

Of course all Nvidia cards after dreadful FX 5800 Ultra have pushed air also inside the case. In original GTX 295 design it pushed less air out of the case.

What do I think? I think that I'd see nightmares of my good old Geforce4 TI4400 and it's horrendeous cooler (noisy and ineffective.. installed this ultra cheap passive cooler on it many years ago and GPU ran cooler after that :) )