These numbers make a lot more sense:
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716
They apparently addressed the old bios issue on the DFI board, and corrected a mistake they made when benchmarking FEAR (they had 12x10 set on the AMD and 10x7 set on Conroe). Now, the numbers basically show Conroe beating AMD by about 20% consistently. This seems realistic to me. Maybe a newer chipset would increase AMD's performance a bit, but I would say 5% max.
Keep in mind that the XE will provide about 12% more clockspeed than the 2.66ghz, so let's say the XE will beat the FX-62 by about 30-ish%.
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716
They apparently addressed the old bios issue on the DFI board, and corrected a mistake they made when benchmarking FEAR (they had 12x10 set on the AMD and 10x7 set on Conroe). Now, the numbers basically show Conroe beating AMD by about 20% consistently. This seems realistic to me. Maybe a newer chipset would increase AMD's performance a bit, but I would say 5% max.
Keep in mind that the XE will provide about 12% more clockspeed than the 2.66ghz, so let's say the XE will beat the FX-62 by about 30-ish%.