Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not what I meant. I want to know what the PSU can do max in terms of hardware, not a SM-8800.
Perhaps testing it on a heavy duty system would have helped also.Well.. given the load put on it, I thnk we can say a pair of FX74's and a couple 8800GTX cards with one or two hard drives.
Seriously, everyone's system varies. That's why I suggest everyone looks at review that throw a PSU in a rig AS WELL AS reviews done on a load tester.
If we really had an 18A limit on each +12V rail, the PSU wouldn't run 8800GTXs in SLI with a bunch of hard drives. However, since the PSU effectively functions as a single +12V rail 50A PSU, it works just fine.
Perhaps testing it on a heavy duty system would have helped also.
SPCR has been advocating Seasonic PSUs for years now. Welcome to the club, boys!
Given that the HX620 only has two PCIe connections, and SLI 8800's would require four PCIe connections, I'm assuming that adapters are being used. Does Corsair have PCIe cables that will plug into the standard connections on the PSU, or were 4-pin to PCIe adapters used ?
That is the problem with rebates they do fluctuate so often. Take $150 as a conservative estimate if you can find it for cheaper
If you want a review in which the PSU isn't actually tested but rather thrown into the biggest baddest rig someone can scrape together and given the Editorials Choice Triple Platinum Award there are more than enough sites out there catering to this type of thing. I will direct your attention back to our opening editorial http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTI4OSwsLGhlbnRodXNpYXN0 that explains all of this already.
Sounds familiar, I remember reading this type of strategy before. But how does a Tripp-Lite LCR2400 Line Conditioner, SunMoon SM-8800 ATE, TDGC-2KM Variable AC Transformer and a Quincy Labs 10-140 incubator represent real world experience and not an idealized situation? I know for a fact my room and most others don't have this type of control over power and temperature. That sounds contradictory. Doesn't the presence of the incubator itself show that you are trying to isolate most variables from testing, to test the capabilities of the PSU itself? A worthy and noble goal, of course. But IIRC, this is the type of thing [H] didn't want to do with "real world" testing right (cue Conroe video performance article and resulting uproar in the forums )?As long time readers know, HardOCPs primary focus is on real world experience not idealized situations or canned testing.
Sounds familiar, I remember reading this type of strategy before. But how does a Tripp-Lite LCR2400 Line Conditioner, SunMoon SM-8800 ATE, TDGC-2KM Variable AC Transformer and a Quincy Labs 10-140 incubator represent real world experience and not an idealized situation? I know for a fact my room and most others don't have this type of control over power and temperature. That sounds contradictory. Doesn't the presence of the incubator itself show that you are trying to isolate most variables from testing, to test the capabilities of the PSU itself? A worthy and noble goal, of course. But IIRC, this is the type of thing [H] didn't want to do with "real world" testing right (cue Conroe video performance article and resulting uproar in the forums )?
Real world experience is what us enthusiasts experience in the real world with these products.
You're not getting my point. I'm not addressing the validity of the actual testing, I think that is fine. It actually is the way I like to see things tested, isolate as many variables to test the actual product itself, not other components or environmental variables. But "real world testing" according to previous iterations of that term dictate that you don't do that. When testing video cards or the Conroe performance in video situations (anyone remember that? The Firing Squid and all that) it was stated for real world testing they want to put it in a situation their readers would put the product in, and test it, because that's what matters. Well that's not the situation here.Actually, I think that you have it quite backwards. What this type of review shows, is the actual strength of the unit. If they just threw it in a quad core, 8800GTX SLi system, then they would be doing the enthusiast a disservice. the load tester does just that, it tests the load the PSU can with stand. That uber-rig might not even come close to straining a rig like the HX620, because the load tester proves that it puts out that much power. Go buy a kill-a-watt, and put it between the PSU and the plug. I bet that psu is pulling, at most, 275-300 watts from the wall, in the uber-rig.
The point of the incubator is to test whether or not the PSU can handle the heat that is inside an enthusiasts case. A PC with 8800GTX's at 65C and a core 2 duo at 45 c produce a lot of heat, and the incubator allows the tester to demonstrate if the psu can handle the heat and still pump the appropriate power.
Simply putting the PSU in a uber-rig proves nothing, because if it did, we could all run Rosewill and Raidmax power supplies with no worries.
Beyond all of the performance metrics it set under our standard testing the HX620W also performed capably when the unit was subjected to a full load test at 45c for 3 hours. This test is not part of the usually testing criteria and only came about out of sheer morbid curiosity of whether or not we could kill the unit.
Sounds familiar, I remember reading this type of strategy before. But how does a Tripp-Lite LCR2400 Line Conditioner, SunMoon SM-8800 ATE, TDGC-2KM Variable AC Transformer and a Quincy Labs 10-140 incubator represent real world experience and not an idealized situation? I know for a fact my room and most others don't have this type of control over power and temperature. That sounds contradictory. Doesn't the presence of the incubator itself show that you are trying to isolate most variables from testing, to test the capabilities of the PSU itself? A worthy and noble goal, of course. But IIRC, this is the type of thing [H] didn't want to do with "real world" testing right (cue Conroe video performance article and resulting uproar in the forums )?
Real world experience is what us enthusiasts experience in the real world with these products.
rotflmfaoBig Fun mit spiten sparken und fusen poppen. !
You're not getting my point. I'm not addressing the validity of the actual testing, I think that is fine. It actually is the way I like to see things tested, isolate as many variables to test the actual product itself, not other components or environmental variables. But "real world testing" according to previous iterations of that term dictate that you don't do that. When testing video cards or the Conroe performance in video situations (anyone remember that? The Firing Squid and all that) it was stated for real world testing they want to put it in a situation their readers would put the product in, and test it, because that's what matters. Well that's not the situation here.
Look at the editorial again. It says "As long time readers know, HardOCPs primary focus is on real world experience not idealized situations or canned testing. "
Would you say that a Tripp-Lite LCR2400 Line Conditioner, SunMoon SM-8800 ATE, TDGC-2KM Variable AC Transformer and a Quincy Labs 10-140 incubator represents a real world situation or an idealized situation, for testing.
I'm not questioning the validity of the testing procedures, those are fine. I'm just wondering how it's real world? In light of previous definitions of the term
Yes, that would be real world more than any test rig. The AVR and UPS is to make sur you get consistant data every time. The variac would simulate real world brown outs and such, and an SM8800, an accurate represnetation of load. Incubator, so you can precisely monitor the temperature to simulate in-case.
Think of buying a Ferrari that is claimed to go 202mph. Testing it with a pc is like driving on a highway: You're not going to be able to test it to what it claims. Now if you had your own racetrack (like the VW test track near east germany), you could actually put that claim to the test.
"Real World" experience is determined by user evaluation of a specific product. In video cards this means not just how many frames i can get (canned benches) but what is the level of visual imersion this product offers me. Cpu reviews are not just how many more frames does .2 ghz get me (canned) but an evaluation of speed, multiple task abilities, application specific responce, and how transparent these are to the user. MB reviews are not just how much i can overclock to get the most frames but how well a board supports it's secondary interfaces (number of ports, type of connections, quality of components), its ability to communicate quickly and efficiently, the ease of use and installation of other part of the system among others, then overclocking.
[H]'s real world experince has set the bar for reviews because they take all these into account.
Now how do you approach "real world" testing of power supplies. Just putting a biggest-baddest system together and "presto the power supply works and i took it to a lan and played for like 12 hours straight man. This one is the best ever." does not acomplish anything. As with Gpu and CPu testing you isolate variables (use the same comparable system) and then test what they can do, power supplies follow the same
principaI. Isolation gives a better idea of a devices capabilites. It tells you how much power these supplies can deliver, how cleanly they do so, and in some cases how they manage to do so (newer or more efficient designes).
All of which is explained in their article on these topics.
I think you are looking for a better idea of how much power all our systems are actually using. How do we judge from the wattage numbers that are on power supplies to what we need. It would be nice is there was a way to cross list the power draw on systems [H] uses for testing of other devices and [H]consumer system reviews, to how much power these supplies offer. An eventual database to compare along side the review of the power supply units. It would also give an idea of the increased power consumption by upgrading say a video card, telling you if you need to upgrade your power supply as well. School project maybe.
Just a thought on how to take this constructively rather than just pointing to previous [H] articles.
You should experience no problems with this power supply. 620 watts really is enough, even for SLI 8800s.I think for my rig that the Corsair just won't or just will do. But I don't like the just. I want some safe spare left. This mobo is trouble enough to hold stable.
Spectre has remarked several times on the impossibility of doing this testing. Look elsewhere.PS: [H] Good review! But next time pls also include a sound level test. For some having a quite system is important. In my rig it's mainly the psu that makes the noise. But again, great review.
Also when adding later on a thing like the Coolit Freezone (waiting for the quad-core version), and some more HDD's? It will be close... And also, I guess when you have some spare left, the psu will run cooler, which results in more quiter.You should experience no problems with this power supply. 620 watts really is enough, even for SLI 8800s.
I thought they couldn't do that because of that tester thing (8000 or something) making to much noise. Hook it up somewhere else... But then that was just a question or suggestion for [H]...Spectre has remarked several times on the impossibility of doing this testing. Look elsewhere.
Also when adding later on a thing like the Coolit Freezone (waiting for the quad-core version), and some more HDD's? It will be close... And also, I guess when you have some spare left, the psu will run cooler, which results in more quiter.
I thought they couldn't do that because of that tester thing (8000 or something) making to much noise. Hook it up somewhere else... But then that was just a question or suggestion for [H]...
And I asked the question also at the users who actually have one. To put their ear to it, and listen if it is really quiete. Like you can't hear it quiete...
Quad core chips only go up to 130W. To quote their site:Also when adding later on a thing like the Coolit Freezone (waiting for the quad-core version), and some more HDD's? It will be close... And also, I guess when you have some spare left, the psu will run cooler, which results in more quiter.
Hooking it up somewhere else makes it hard to judge the load on a given power supply. It's a moot point, anyways; they're not going to.I thought they couldn't do that because of that tester thing (8000 or something) making to much noise. Hook it up somewhere else... But then that was just a question or suggestion for [H]...
To put their ear to it, and listen if it is really quiete. Like you can't hear it quiete...
Ah, ik maak wat fouten in het engels en ze hebben kommentaar. Wat grappig...Quieté... Il est français?