Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nope, i didn't. i thought about it, but then decided not to because i snapped a couple pictures. now i know i'm not a photographer, but i figured at least one would have turned out decent.(cf)Eclipse said:did you write it down on a piece of paper?
and put up the picture, someone might be able to read it
SpoogeMonkey said:Quick question. Is the 24 pin atx plug absolutley needed on the asus sli deluxe if you're not running sli? I just got another 3000+ venice and this mobo, but i cant find my 20-24pin adapter....and I dont wanna wait til monday for fed ex to send one.
I actually took one of those pictures with macro mode on. Oh well.(cf)Eclipse said:for future reference, there should be a button that looks like a flower on the camera to enable and disable macro mode. this will let the camera focus on things really close. try it
ntune is wrong... always wrong. hahaha, look at cpu-z, probably 1.6v in the biosashmedai said:55C on a Venice? With all of 1.425V and 2.5GHz? Meep. It's safe enough, just rather high.
(cf)Eclipse said:ntune is wrong... always wrong. hahaha, look at cpu-z, probably 1.6v in the bios
Yep. Configured so that the CPU can take up to 1.6v as it needs.(cf)Eclipse said:ntune is wrong... always wrong. hahaha, look at cpu-z, probably 1.6v in the bios
Why? Because this chip would only go up about 90MHz before needing more voltage. The upside for that, though, is it idles super cool at stock settings, around 20C.ashmedai said:And if true, I'd be going "um, why do you need 1.6V for only 2.5GHz?" instead.
I actually had this chip stable at above 2.6GHz with an 8x multiplier, but I had to give it around 1.65V. I'm just not comfortable leaving the voltage up that high on air cooling though.(cf)Eclipse said:because he has a 3000+. i have seen quite a few have trouble breaking 2.5ghz.. one actually topped out under 2.2ghz. why they haven't posted in the db like i asked them to (esp after i helped them out for a considerable length of time), i do not know.. and it makes me angry because the results are now skewed.
yeah.. 1.65v is a lot, esp if temps are getting to 55c with 1.6v. i wouldn't botheraaronfitz said:I actually had this chip stable at above 2.6GHz with an 8x multiplier, but I had to give it around 1.65V. I'm just not comfortable leaving the voltage up that high on air cooling though.
Should I lower the voltage and throttle back the clock some? Part of me wants to, but the bigger part of me doesn't want to.
EDIT: Would trying to lower the Tras on the memory yield any performance gains? Or should I just leave it be.
not true, it's just that the people with cpu's like yours won't post in the dbBudwise said:Ive had a horrid time of OCing my 3700 San Diego. Everyone seems to hitting at least 2750 with 1.55Vore or so
well, not quite. the overclock i settled on is [email protected] (284x9), but i had [email protected] (320x8) stable. increasing to 1.65v let me get a tad higher than 325x8 stable, which is just a tiny bit over 2.6ghz. so around 5mhz htt (40mhz) for 0.05v increase there.(cf)Eclipse said:however, an alarm is going off in my head. you went from 2.5ghz at 1.6v to 2.6ghz with 1.65v? the scaling there.. is very interesting. far more mhz gain than i would expect from a bump from 1.6v to 1.65v
markintosh13 said:*click* refresh
*click* refresh
*click* refresh