How does the w2207h or w2007 compare with the Samsung 2232BW+ as far as color accuracy and detail?
On my Samsung when contrast is below 70 I start to see banding and artifacts in reds and pinks sometimes blues as well. It looked better in the store but of course that means hardly anything when comparing an LCD for home use.
I edit photos quite a bit(in my opinion). Maybe 200-300 per week and watch movies.
One thing I absolutely hate about my Samsung 2232BW+ is the backlight bleed. The darker scenes don't really bother me but rather the white scenes, even Google's home page where the outer edges especially on the right side are yellowish instead of white. Anything like this on the w2207h?
I'm going on 2 weeks with my 2207h and I've been VERY pleased with it. Just recently put a DVI-HDMI cable on it (only had the VGA cable previously) and think it's just a tad sharper and no need for hitting the "Auto" button from time to time. So far, I haven't touched any of the settings, and I haven't noticed any color discrepancies or any issues worth mentioning. Most of my use is for desktop publishing, Internet stuff, and watching movies once in a while, though I also download pictures off my digital camera and touch-up any that I deem in need of it. For the record, I've dealt with & used LCD monitors before (AOC, Dell, & Samsung), so I know what to expect of them, and this one blows them all away, as far as I'm concerned.