I saw the screen in a showroom today, and it was not glossy
excelent, just waiting for a price and a confirmation of the panel type. If I even get a hint of a VA based panel then it gets the sledgehammer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw the screen in a showroom today, and it was not glossy
I saw the screen in a showroom today, and it was not glossy
I saw the screen in a showroom today, and it was not glossy
excelent, just waiting for a price and a confirmation of the panel type. If I even get a hint of a VA based panel then it gets the sledgehammer.
I’m basically caught up in the same dilemma. I actually ordered a 3008WFP and there have been several delays in getting it delivered. At a $2000 price tag I’m considering canceling my order and going with the Gateway. Not meaning to hijack your thread Albert, but do any of you guys know if there is a direct comparison thread between the 3008WFP and the XDH3000?
http://www.cnet.com.au/desktops/monitors/0,239029422,339284554,00.htm
"Update: Dell has sent us updated information detailing that the 3008WFP uses an S-IPS panel, not an S-PVA as previously advised"
"While it is a non-glossy screen...."
"While it is a non-glossy screen...."
If it is less than $1500, I will be picking this one up.
From what I have read 100% color gmaut coupled with display port is the best way to go, because display port can support the bandwidth necessary to make proper use of it.
Dave
Add 100% color gamut and 3000:1 contrast ratio to the pluses.
The contrast ratio is no big deal, but the color gamut is. From what I have read 100% color gmaut coupled with display port is the best way to go, because display port can support the bandwidth necessary to make proper use of it.
I don't think we can say what the scaler chip is in the 3008wfp, so it could be the same, better, or worse than the HQV chip in the Gateway.
Dave
How is bandwidth associated with proper use of 100% color? You computer isn't outputing any more bandwidth be it 72% color or otherwise.
The same is true with Display Port, except Display Port uses a different format as well. The bad news is there is 3 competing formats HDMI, Display Port, and UDI (Universal Display Interface). All being supported by different groups of companies. Of course it is really a battle over royalities.
/EDIT
EDIT:
OK; I checked into this a little further. Apparently to make proper use of a wider color gamut you have to add more color bits. The following artical talks about 36 or 48 bit color associated with the higher color gamuts available in HDMI 1.3.
/EDIT
http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/3008wfp?c=au&cs=audhs1&l=en&s=dhs
Dell 3008WFP Advantages over Gateway
Design & Height Adjustabilty / No Height Adjustability
Super IPS versus S-PVA
Viewing Angles 178% versus 176%
117% Colour Gamut versus 72% Colour Gamut
Display Port / No Display Port
7 Digital & Analogue Connectors / 6 Connectors
3000:1 Dynamic contrast / No Dynamic Contrast
1000:1 contrast versus 900:1
Both have Built in Scalers
Response 8 Ms Versus 6Ms
Pixel Pitch .2505 versus .251
And the new king of monitors is Dell 3008WFP.
The difference in color gamut is debatable if it's even noticeable to 99% of users. You would need to break out the screen calibrator just for it to see a difference. .
Lol, he puts Dell's 8ms over Gateways 6ms as a Dell Advantage. Viewing angles for all intents and purposes are identical. The difference in color gamut is debatable if it's even noticeable to 99% of users. You would need to break out the screen calibrator just for it to see a difference. Display-port has no advantages over DUAL-Link DVI when hooking up a computer to run 2560x1600. The Gateways scalar is undoubtedly better then the Dell's. Dell doesn't even mention what kind of scalar it is. Most likely the regular mass produced one that they put into every monitor that doesn’t perform very well. I think we can toss the .005 mm pixel difference into the get a clue column. They are both 30" LCD's running 2560x1600. Not to mention the Gateway has a better menu, better PIP implementation, a remote and a decent speaker bar. All for $300 less.
Lol, he puts Dell's 8ms over Gateways 6ms as a Dell Advantage.
Viewing angles for all intents and purposes are identical.
It is likely noticeable, you can say it is not important to you, but it is noticeable and will be important to some.The difference in color gamut is debatable if it's even noticeable to 99% of users.
Probably true - I haven't seen the 2560x1600 implementation details, it may not even handle 2560x1600 in this implementation.Display-port has no advantages over DUAL-Link DVI when hooking up a computer to run 2560x1600.
The Gateways scalar is undoubtedly better then the Dell's. Dell doesn't even mention what kind of scalar it is. Most likely the regular mass produced one that they put into every monitor that doesnt perform very well.
Agree.I think we can toss the .005 mm pixel difference into the get a clue column. They are both 30" LCD's running 2560x1600.
Not to mention the Gateway has a better menu, better PIP implementation
a remote and a decent speaker bar. All for $300 less.
http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/3008wfp?c=au&cs=audhs1&l=en&s=dhs
Dell 3008WFP Advantages over Gateway
Design & Height Adjustabilty / No Height Adjustability
Super IPS versus S-PVA
Viewing Angles 178% versus 176%
117% Colour Gamut versus 72% Colour Gamut
Display Port / No Display Port
7 Digital & Analogue Connectors / 6 Connectors
3000:1 Dynamic contrast / No Dynamic Contrast
1000:1 contrast versus 900:1
Both have Built in Scalers
Response 8 Ms Versus 6Ms
Pixel Pitch .2505 versus .251
And the new king of monitors is Dell 3008WFP.
The review linked earlier talked about how awkward the Dell menu was for PIPWhere were the menu systems compared?
Actually that is EXACTLY when you would likely be switching sources, when you are sitting away from your computer. Say to switch between a movie or TV or game console. Plus the remote is programmable so it can switch channels and use it to run your other devices as well as adjusting viewing settings.What do you use remote for on a monitor, you can't change channels and if you are sitting away from you computer you are unlikely to be switching sources.
I stopped looking for a 3008WFP. I'm sick of waiting for a new 30".
I bought the best 27" available on the market with a great scalar, it's the Samsung 275T. I don't regret it one bit! I can now play any game I want at GREAT settings with a great size plus I got PIP so I hooked my PVR via component and I have TV in a lil box while playing a game