Removing UI elements isn't access control. There will always be ways around it. Set ACLs on the actual executables so that users can't run them. THAT'S how you prevent access. Otherwise there are infinite ways around it.
Also, it sounds like you want to switch out the shell process entirely...
The desktop? The thing that's covered by my apps all the time? Why would I put anything there? The Start Menu is easy to get to on any monitor at any time.
The number of businesses out there still relying on ancient 16-bit Windows (or DOS!) applications for their line of business would depress you. And it's not like saying "use DOSBox" or "use a VM" is a working solution since plenty of them are relying on ancient hardware drivers to connect with...
Full disclaimer: I work at a Fortune 500 software company. I've also done recruiting for said company. The unfortunate reality that people don't seem to want to admit is that most Americans just aren't qualified for these jobs. If one in ten computer science graduates I talk to is worth...
The MSDN page shows you what the class returns - a Process struct. It shows you its members and methods, one of which gets the process name as a string.
That's not really the case at all....there's a large chunk of hardware that VMs don't see directly. In general, GPUs aren't directly shared, and for the most part the VM doesn't necessarily see the "real" motherboard, chipsets, etc. - they're all virtualized through different drivers.
Presumably you were running 32-bit Windows XP and are trying to install 64-bit Windows 8.1, which is why you confused the upgrade wizard (you can never upgrade cross-architecture). You can run the 32-bit version of Windows 8.1 on your CPU, but not the 64-bit version.
If you want a definitive language resource, Stroustrup is good, but if you want to actually learn the language, I recommend Lippman's C++ Primer (there are several books titled C++ primer, but Lippman's the best). My job every day of the week is writing C++ code, and while I own Stroustrup...
You need to decide what behavior you really want, and write some code to parse it as appropriate. Is it OK if there's whitespace before the //? If so, you need to account for that.
Part of it depends on what you want to do - if you're trying to actually parse a file into some meaningful...
This isn't a Windows thing. Games pausing when they lose focus is 100% up to the game. This happened on Windows 8, and 7, and Vista, and XP, and.....you get the point. The PROGRAM is entirely in control of this behavior.
Clean installs are fresh and performant. Upgrades leave cruft, be it old drivers, old registry settings, stuff apps had sitting around that isn't used anymore, etc., etc., etc.
If you're looking for a performance boost, don't do a multi-upgrade. Just do a clean install. And you absolutely cannot upgrade between x86 and x64, period.
Do you have multiple machines with the same name? Where "machines" counts each bootable partition as the same "name". That can mess with trust.
Presuming no existing name duplication, I've found leaving the domain and rejoining it the simplest way of fixing things.
Neither of those methods are secure at all.
LastPass is one of the best options here. TrueCrypt is another decent option. Depending on your Windows SKU, you could use Bitlocker with a PIN.
No version of Windows is abandonware. Win 3.1 isn't even on MSDN any more (it's ancient), and you will never find Windows 95/98 available from Microsoft due to the Java Settlement.
If you're planning on using RAID, you should be using md (software RAID) and then putting whatever filesystem you want on top of that. If you're going to run Linux on your server, don't have your drives be in NTFS - the drivers still just aren't as stable, particularly if you're using weird...
No. No, no, no. No. Do not remove the updates. Several of them you probably can't remove, and the rest should under no condition be removed. They're not what's slowing your computer.
Gadgets were written in CSS/HTML/JS, with all of the security issues associated with that. Any gadget that was written less than flawlessly could be exploited - not just a specific malicious gadget. The entire design was flawed, which is why they were shut down. Let them die.
I don't even understand this statement. Do you honestly believe that they just write something from scratch every time? That's not how software development works. Ever since Windows NT 3.1 was written, every later version of Windows to the present (NT3.1 -> NT3.5 -> NT4 -> 2000 -> XP -> Vista...
Is once a day really necessary? If I don't want to install the plugin today, I'm not going to want to install it tomorrow. Quite frankly, I'll get annoyed enough to stop coming to the site before I get annoyed enough to install a plugin I don't want or need.
You cannot legally install Mac OS X on any non-Mac hardware. There are a wide variety of other operating systems out there such as the BSD family (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, etc.), Haiku (which is a derivative of the BeOS model as I understand it), and several others with niche userbases.
While $7K may or may not be a bit high, the penalty has to be higher than the actual cost of the book or else it would make perfect economic sense to pirate - steal everything, only pay when you get caught.