Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think it's possible to overclock an i5-750 up to 3.6 GHz (with turbo) with the ST45SF. I did a research but I'm still unsure. Here's what I found out:
* The i5-750 can reach 3.6 GHz without a voltage increase.
* Required bus speed - about 175 MHz.
* DFI's safety regulation for overclocking the MI P55-T36 state that the TDP should be below 110W and BCLK - up to 180 (which is within boundaries).
The system I intend to use is:
Case: SG06
PSU: ST45SF
MB: MI P55-T36
CPU: i5-750
GPU: GTX 470
RAM: 2x2GB @ 1330
What do you think?
201W - Core i7 860 OC'd to 3.6Ghz + mobo + HDD
Aren't you forgetting something? 201W for CPU+mobo+HDD doesn't strike you as odd? Their testbed includes a 5870 that's why. Your 411W total number is overshooting by at least 50W.
Actually you are right that I forgot about the video card. However the HD 5870 only uses 15W on a typical Windows 7 desktop according to this review.
So I only overshot by 15W, not 50W. Like I said, it's doable but still pushing the PSU a bit. Can't be good for the PSU in the long run,
Listen I am not trying to argue but do you honestly believe that a Core i7 860 (3.6GHz) + mobo + memory + HDD draws 185W DC? I say no way. Anyway that's a moot point because all those numbers represent absolute maximum power (ie Furmark + Prime95) and even the most demanding games come nowhere near those numbers. SO if you are going to run ORTHOS + Furmark 24/7 then yeah that's pushing the PSU a (little) bit. If not you are well within its capacity.
From the above reviews that I posted, yes I do honestly believe all of that will draw 185W DC. If you have information showing otherwise using a more accurate method than the ones used in the above Xbit reviews, I'll be glad to read it and update my posts accordingly.
I am not trying to say that the article is wrong.
I looked at the number: and I came to the obvious conclusion that I was wrong. I never realised (never wanted to believe) how much additional power the increase in clock speed (2.8->3.6) would require. On top of it Asus boards are rarely known for their power efficiency.
Even if power consumption is 185W, it's still doable, I think. 185W (CPU + MB, etc) + 210W (GPU) = 395W which is reasonably below 436W, right?
You should trim the cables as well....they are just as long as the original which is frustrating because you never need that much slack...and if one of you actually do then screw you because you ruined it for the rest of usMine arrived today. very happy with it... now to resleeve the waranty out of it!
Even if it works...shouldn't be good for the PSU.
Of course my measurements were taken with a kill-a-watt, but my i5 [email protected] 3.5Ghz and a GTS250 are drawing 303w during furmark+prime
Sure thats not a real usage scenario, but even gaming it's drawing 240w.
It will work, no matter the GPU you use, the question is wether it will last or not.
Underclocking my 5870 generated CONSIDERABLY less heat. I wish I had a kill-a-watt to check